An evaluation of project completion with application of fuzzy set theory
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Zielona Góra
 
 
Online publication date: 2012-06-14
 
 
Management 2012;16(1):216-229
 
ABSTRACT
The project management contains such elements as management of time, cost, communications, procurement, quality, risk or scope of project. Each of these fields can be considered as a set of constraints, and then there is a possibility to verify their fulfillment in sense of an enterprise's constraints and its environment. These constraints determine a completion of project activities and its success or failure, finally. The paper aims to present a problem of project management in terms of fuzzy constraints satisfaction problem, and then the using of constraint programming techniques to the evaluation of project completion. A fuzzy constraints satisfaction problem enables a description of data in distinct, as well as imprecise form, in a unified framework. It seems especially important in case of unique activities of project, when their estimation is based on linguistic information from experts.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Bocewicz G., Bach-Dąbrowska I., Banaszak Z. (2009), Deklaratywne projektowanie systemów komputerowego wspomagania planowania przedsięwzięć, Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT, Warszawa.
 
2.
Bubnicki Z. (1998), Logic-algebraic method for knowledge-based relation systems, Systems Analysis Modelling and Simulation, vol. 33, ss. 21-35.
 
3.
Bubnicki Z. (1999), Procesy uczenia i metoda logiczno-algebraiczna w systemach z reprezentacją wiedzy, Analiza systemowa i zarządzanie, Instytut Badań Systemowych PAN, Warszawa.
 
4.
Dubois D., Fargier H., Fortemps P. (2003), Fuzzy scheduling: modeling flexible constraints vs. coping with incomplete knowledge, European Journal of Operational Research, no. 147, ss. 231-252.
 
5.
Hooker J. N. (2002), Logic, optimisation and constraint programming, Journal on Computing, vol. 14, ss. 295-321.
 
6.
Kerzner H. (2009), Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10th ed., John Wiley and Sons.
 
7.
Łęski J. (2008), Systemy neuronowo-rozmyte, WNT, Warszawa.
 
8.
Nitithamyong P., Skibniewski M. J. (2006), Success/failure factors and performance measures of web-based construction project management systems: professionals' viewpoint, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 132, ss. 80-87.
 
9.
Piegat A. (2003), Modelowanie i sterowanie rozmyte, Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT.
 
10.
Relich M. (2011), Project prototyping with application of CP-based approach, Management, vol. 15, no 2, ss. 364-377.
 
11.
Robertson S., Williams T. (2006), Understanding project failure: using cognitive mapping in an insurance project, Project Management Journal, vol. 37, ss. 55-71.
 
12.
Rossi F. (2000), Constraint (logic) programming: A survey on research and applications, K. R. Apt i in. (red.), New Trends in Constraints, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ss. 40-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-....
 
13.
Rutkowska D., Piliński M., Rutkowski L. (1999), Sieci neuronowe, algorytmy genetyczne i systemy rozmyte, PWN, Warszawa.
 
14.
Shore B. (2008), Systematic biases and culture in project failures, Project Management Journal, vol. 39, ss. 5-16.
 
15.
Spałek S. (2004), Krytyczne czynniki sukcesu w zarządzaniu projektami, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
 
16.
Szyjewski Z. (2004), Metodyki zarządzania projektami informatycznymi, Placet, Warszawa.
 
17.
Trocki M., Grucza B., Ogonek K. (2009), Zarządzanie projektami, PWE, Warszawa.
 
18.
Van Roy P., Haridi S. (2004), Concepts, techniques and models of computer programming, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
 
19.
www.mozart-oz.org/datadostępu.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top