Chosen determinants of coopetition between the industrial companies of the Lubusz region in the 2009-2011 period / Wybrane determinanty koopetycji przedsiębiorstw przemysłowych z województwa lubuskiego w latach 2009-2011
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Zielona Góra Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
 
 
Online publication date: 2013-05-31
 
 
Management 2013;17(1):219-232
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Analysing the literature dealing with coopetition on both national and international levels, one cannot help but notice that this notion has recently become increasingly more popular. The same cannot be said however, of the notion of coopetition from a practical point of view. The empirical results obtained using the probit model. Analysing the influence of customer sectors for the researched companies it can be noticed that having customers in transportation and trade sectors stimulates the establishing of coopetition. Analysing the influence of relations maintained with the supply network participants it should be pointed out that only having close relations with competitors can positively influence entering into coopetition. Other kinds of relations maintained with competitors influence coopetition negatively. Coopetition is also positively influenced by maintaining only the necessary relations with customers by the industrial companies from South-East Poland. Lack of closer relations with customers forces the industrial companies to look out for other enterprises that can aid in further development of the company. Maintaining only the necessary relations with suppliers influences coopetition negatively. Considering the distance between the participants of supply network, having suppliers and customers located outside Poland influences coopetition negatively.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
BarNir A., Smith K. A. (2002), Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: TheRole of Social Networks, “Journalof Small Business Management”, No. 40 (3).
 
2.
Bengtsson M., Kock S. (2000), Coopetition in business networks - to cooperateand compete simultaneously, “Industrial Marketing Management”, No. 29.
 
3.
Carayannis E. G., Alexander J. (1999), Winning by Co-opeting in StrategicGovernment-University-Industry. R&D Partnerships: The Power of Complex,Dynamic Knowledge Networks, “Journal of Technology Transfer”, No. 24 (2-3).
 
4.
Chen M. J. (1996), Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Towarda Theoretical Integration, “Academy of Management Review”, No. 21 (1).
 
5.
Chen M. J. (2008), Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship;a transparadox perspective, “Journal of Management Inquiry”, No. 17.
 
6.
Coy P. (2006), Sleeping with the Enemy, “Business Week”, August 21-28.
 
7.
Gimeno J. (2004), Competition within and between networks: the contingenteffect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation, “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 47.
 
8.
Gnyawali D. R., Park B.-J. (2009), Co-opetition and technological innovation insmall and medium-sized enterprises; a multilevel conceptual model, “Journal of Small Business Management”, No. 47 (3).
 
9.
Gomes-Casseres B. (1997), Alliance Strategies of Small Firms, “Small Business Economics”, No. 9 (1).
 
10.
Harbison, J. R., P. Pekar P. Jr. (1998), Smart Alliances. : Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
 
11.
Kim J., Parkhe A. (2009), Competing and cooperating similarity in global strategicalliances; An exploratory examination, “British Journal of Management”, No. 20.
 
12.
Lado A. A., Boyd N. G., Hanlon S. G. (1997), Competition, cooperation, andthe search for economic rents; a syncretic model, “Academy of Management Review”, No. 22.
 
13.
Luo X., Rindfleisch A., Tse D. (2007), Working with rivals: the impactof competitor alliances on financial performance, “Journal of Marketing Research”, No. 44.
 
14.
Luo Y. (2007), A coopetition perspective of global competition, “Journal of World Business”, No. 42.
 
15.
Madhavan R., Gnyawali D. R., He J. (2004), Two’s company, three’s a crowd?Triads in cooperative-competitive networks, “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 47.
 
16.
Merrifield D. B. (2007), Strategic Collaborations - Essence of Survival, “Research Technology Management”, No. 50 (2).
 
17.
Peng T.-J. A., Bourne M. (2009), The coexistence of competition and cooperationbetween networks: implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks, “British Journal of Management”, No. 20.
 
18.
Quint B. (1997), Coopetition: sleeping with the enemy, “Information Today”, No. 14.
 
19.
Quintana-García C., Benavides-Velasco C. A. (2004), Cooperation,Competition, and Innovative Capability: A Panel Data of European DedicatedBiotechnology Firms, “Technovation”, No. 24 (12).
 
20.
Ritala P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. (2009), What′s in it for me? Creatingand appropriating value in innovationrelated coopetition, “Technovation”, No. 29.
 
21.
The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, 2008.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top