SCIENCE ARTICLE
Does digital eruption threaten teaching work at universities? The mental models of faculty for online teaching and learning
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Managemnet, UE Poznań, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-09-13
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-12-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-02-07
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-01-04
 
 
Publication date: 2025-04-17
 
 
Corresponding author
Elżbieta Kowalczyk   

Institute of Managemnet, UE Poznań, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875, Poznań, Poland
 
 
Management 2025;(1):145-166
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
I2
M5
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Research background and purpose: From year to year, the digitalisation is more present in the work of faculty, but changing conditions raises many concerns and reluctant attitudes mirrored in MM. This leads to a sluggishness in using technology-based tools and persists in a nondigital condition. The purpose of this paper is to diagnose mental models (MM) of university teachers with respect to online teaching and learning (OTL) and to show their impact on the professional performance of teachers. In the study, the author is seeking an answer on the title question - does digital eruption threaten teaching work at universities? Design and methodology: In this study, MMs were measured using the Osgood semantic differential method, while occupational performance was measured on a 5-degree Likert-type scale. Two cluster analysis methods were used and three types of MMs were distinguished among academics with regard to OTL: reluctant, neutral, and enthusiast. Furthermore, the dendrogram method was used to visualise the aggregation of statements related to OTL. Findings: It was established that organisational technology support is not a differentiating factor for teachers’ MMs. An enthusiast MM was found to result in lower stress related to OTL, greater self-esteem in digital competence, and a desire for self-improvement. Better assessment of students’ abilities and student motivation and relationships. The use of technology-based educational methods depended on the type of MM. Value added and limitations: The research contributes to the discussion on the need for change in the attitudes of academics towards the use of online tools in teaching and highlights the mismatch between teaching tools and the expectations of society 5.0. The main limitation of the research is the number of respondents and the spatial coverage of the research. The difficulty also stems from the boundaries of the tools that are used to measure mental models.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project financed within the Regional Initiative for Excellence programme of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of Poland, years 2019-2023, grant no. 004/RID/2018/19, financing 3,000,000 PLN.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
2.
Bedyńska, S., & Cypryańska, M. (Red.). (2013). Statystyczny drogowskaz 1. Praktyczne wprowadzenie do wnioskowania statystycznego [Statistical guidepost 1. A practical introduction to statistical inference]. Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO.
 
3.
Berlyne, D. E., & Peckham, S. (1966). The semantic differential and other measures of reaction to visual complexity - ProQuest. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 20(125). https://www.proquest.com/openv....
 
4.
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/EJED.1....
 
5.
Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2005). Promoting fourth graders’ conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 429–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20....
 
6.
Chiu, T. K. F., Lin, T.-J., & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating Online Learning: The Challenges of COVID-19 and Beyond. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 187–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
7.
Darwanto, B., Rini, S. E. S., & Herusatoto, H. (2021). Technology: language teachers’ digital and navigating skills in emergency education. Xlinguae, 14(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.20....
 
8.
Dias-Trindade, S., & Moreira, J. A. (2020). Assessment of high school teachers on their digital competences. Magis Revista Internacional De Investigación En Educación, 13, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javer...
 
9.
Doyle, J. K., & Ford, D. N. (1998). Mental models concepts for system dynamics research. System Dynamics Review, 14(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<3::AID-SDR140>3.0.CO;2-K
 
10.
European Commission. (2022, July 25). Digital Education Action Plan - Action 4. https://education.ec.europa.eu...?.
 
11.
Eurostat. (n.d.). Digital economy and society - Database. Retrieved May 18, 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/....
 
12.
Fernández, A., Beatriz Gómez,Kleona Binjaku, Elinda, & Meçe, K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12351–12382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
13.
Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2020). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83, 317–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
14.
Gündüzalp, S. (2021). 21st century skills for sustainable education: prediction level of teachers’ information literacy skills on their digital literacy skills. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2....
 
15.
Guppy, N., David Boud, ·, Heap, T., Verpoorten, D., Matzat, U., Tai, J., Lutze-Mann, L., Roth, M., Polly, P., Burgess, J.-L., Agapito, J., & Bartolic, S. (123 C.E.). Teaching and learning under COVID-19 public health edicts: the role of household lockdowns and prior technology usage. Higher Education, 84, 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734....
 
16.
Hall, J. A., Steele, R. G., Christofferson, J., & Mihailova, T. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of a multidimensional digital stress scale Friendship expectations View project. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas000....
 
17.
Hashim, M. A. M., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
18.
Heise, D. R. (1969). Some methodological issues in semantic differential research. Psychological Bulletin, 72(6), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/H00284....
 
19.
Hemforth, B., & Konieczny, L. (2006). Language Processing: Construction of Mental Models or More? In C. Held, M. Knauff, & G. Vosgerau (Eds.), Mental models and the mind: Current developments in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind (pp. 189–204). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-....
 
20.
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental Models An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26....
 
21.
Karageorgou, Z. (2022). The impact of knowledge management processes on teachers’ digital skills. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.....
 
22.
Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in Student Motivation during Online Learning. J. Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.....
 
23.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854– 1884.
 
24.
Manrique, M. S., & Abchi, V. S. (2015). Teachers´ Practices and Mental Models: Transformation Through Reflection on Action. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 2. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.....
 
25.
Ming Wut, T., Mei-lan Ng, P., & Peng Low, M. (2023). Engaging university students in online learning: a regional comparative study from the perspective of social presence theory. Journal of Computers in Education, 11, 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692....
 
26.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
27.
Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S.S., Goswami, S., & Thakre, S. (2022). Adoption of online education channel during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic lockdown: an empirical study from push-pull-mooring framework. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692....
 
28.
Novilia, R. M., & Riyanto, S. (2023). The Influence Of Infrastructure, Learning Methods On Student Achievement Through Student Learning Motivation During The COVID-19 Pancemic at SMK Negeri 9 Jakarta. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS), 4(4), 6–10.https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms....
 
29.
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc9....
 
30.
Osgood, C. (1964). Semantic Difmential Technique in the Comparative Study of Cultures. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.196....
 
31.
Pauen, M. (2006). Emotion, Decision and Mental Models. In C. Held, M. Knauff, & G. Vosgerau (Eds.), Mental Models and the Mind : Current Developments in Cognitive Psychology, Neuroscience and Philosophy of Mind (pp. 173–188). Elsevier .
 
32.
Pressley, T., Ha, C., & Learn, E. (2021). Teacher stress and anxiety during COVID-19: An empirical study. School Psychology, 36(5), 367. https://doi.org/10.1037/SPQ000....
 
33.
Pyżalski, J., & Walter, N. (2021). Edukacja zdalna w czasie pandemii COVID-19 w Polsce – mapa głównych szans i zagrożeń [Remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland – a map of main opportunities and threats]. Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. https://operon.pl/Edukacja_zda...
 
34.
Rahman, M. (2020). Impact of digital technology in higher education. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(5), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs....
 
35.
Ramadhani, F. (2020). Perceived organizational support: a case of special education teacher. Business and Finance Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33086/bfj.v....
 
36.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-....
 
37.
Rosenberg, B. D., & Navarro, M. A. (2018). Semantic Differential Scaling. In B.B. Frey (Eds.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of EducationalResearch, Measurement, and Evaluation (pp. 1504–1507). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.....
 
38.
Russo-Zimet, G. (2017). Artist-teachers’ in-action mental models while teaching visual arts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.....
 
39.
Scherpereel, C. M. (2005). Simulation Gaming Changing mental models: Business simulation exercises. SIMULATION & GAMING, 36(5), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687....
 
40.
St.Amant, K. (2021). A Cognitive Model Approach to Creating Usable Health Care Content. American Medical Writers Association Journal, 36(3), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.55752/amwa.....
 
41.
Stoklasa, J., Talášek, T., & Stoklasová, J. (2019). Semantic differential for the twenty-first century: scale relevance and uncertainty entering the semantic space. Qual Quant, 53, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135....
 
42.
Tarnanen, M., Kostiainen, E., Kaukonen, V., Martin, A., & Toikka, T. (2021). Towards a learning community: understanding teachers’ mental models to support their professional development and learning. Professional Development in Education, 50(5), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/194152....
 
43.
Toto, G. A., & Limone, P. (2021). Motivation, Stress and Impact of Online Teaching on Italian Teachers during COVID-19. Computers, 10(75). https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.3390/comput....
 
44.
van Ments, L., & Treur, J. (2021). Reflections on dynamics, adaptation and control: A cognitive architecture for mental models. Cognitive Systems Research, 70, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGS....
 
45.
Verhagen, T., van den Hooff, B. J., & Meents, S. (2015). Towards a Better Use of the Semantic Differential in IS Research: An Integrative Framework of Suggested Action. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(2), 108-143. http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/v....
 
46.
Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., Knight, C., Goodall, J., & Goodall jsgoodall, J. (2021). COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education, 81, 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734....
 
47.
Zhang, X., Li, S., Wang, S., & Xu, J. (2022). Influence of job environment on the online teaching anxiety of college teachers in the online teaching context: the mediating role of subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.....
 
48.
Zhu, Y., Xu, S., Wang, W., Zhang, L., Liu, D., Liu, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Education and Information Technologies. 27, 8921–8938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top