Energy Benchmarking Management for Beer and Beverage Industry in Vietnam
 
More details
Hide details
1
Electric Power University, Faculty of Industrial and Energy Management, Hanoi, Vietnam
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-12-31
 
 
Management 2021;25(2):36-58
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
L53
L6
P18
Q43
 
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to introduce basic principles of benchmarking and explain the methodology to set the specific energy consumption (SEC) target for the beer and beverage industry in Vietnam to evaluate performance, support decisions, and energy efficiency (EE) improvement. Energy benchmarking management method is used to assess EE performance. This study also presents the SEC methodology as a guide for Vietnam enterprises in the brewery sector on how to manage the EE consumption and to comply with the legal energy consumption quota in the beer and beverage production. The study supports the enterprise in how to determine the SEC and support for national EE is essential to the promotion and deployment of practical energy-saving solutions and compliance with the SEC through a suitable energy-saving target. In addition, this paper is introducing the original SEC calculation in three cases of production in the beer and beverage industry including producing beer only, producing beverage only, and producing both beer & beverage in the context of Vietnam.
 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Assawamartbunlue, K., & Luknongbu, W. (2020). Specific energy consumption of native starch industry in Thailand. Energy Reports, 6, 299-303.
 
2.
Assawamartbunlue, K., Surawattanawan, P., & Luknongbu, W. (2019). Specific energy consumption of cement in Thailand. Energy Procedia, 156, 212-216.
 
3.
Bertoldi, P., & Mosconi, R. (2020). Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU Member States). Energy Policy, 139, 111320, 1-18.
 
4.
Farla, J., Blok, K., & Schipper, L. (1997). Energy efficiency developments in the pulp and paper industry: A cross-country comparison using physical production data. Energy Policy, 25(7-9), 745-758.
 
5.
Fleiter, T., Fehrenbach, D., Worrell, E., & Eichhammer, W. (2012). Energy efficiency in the German pulp and paper industry–A model-based assessment of saving potentials. Energy, 40(1), 84-99.
 
6.
Gruber, E., Fleiter, T., Mai, M., & Frahm, B. (2011). Efficiency of an energy audit programme for SMEs in Germany–results of an evaluation study. Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) Summer Study, Presqu’île de Giens, France, 5-10.
 
7.
Hui, M., & Wong, M. (2010, 2-3 July 2010). Benchmarking the energy performance of hotel buildings in Hong Kong. Paper presented at the Liaoning Hong Kong Joint Symposium. Dalian, China, Dalian, China.
 
8.
Hui, S. C. (2010). Energy benchmarking for buildings and plant engineering. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the SOE Symposium.
 
9.
Kubule, A., Zogla, L., Ikaunieks, J., & Rosa, M. (2016). Highlights on energy efficiency improvements: a case of a small brewery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 275-286.
 
10.
Labandeira, X., Labeaga, J. M., Linares, P., & López-Otero, X. (2020). The impacts of energy efficiency policies: Meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 147, 111790, 1-27.
 
11.
Lawrence, A., Karlsson, M., & Thollander, P. (2018). Effects of firm characteristics and energy management for improving energy efficiency in the pulp and paper industry. Energy, 153, 825-835.
 
12.
Lawrence, A., Thollander, P., Andrei, M., & Karlsson, M. (2019). Specific energy consumption/use (SEC) in energy management for improving energy efficiency in industry: Meaning, usage and differences. Energies, 12(2), 247.
 
13.
Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam. (2016). Circular No. 19/2016/TT-BCT on energy consumption quota in the beer and beverage production industry.
 
14.
Mull, T. E. (2001). Practical guide to energy management for facilities engineers and managers. New York: Amer Society of Mechanical.
 
15.
Muster-Slawitsch, B., Hubmann, M., Murkovic, M., & Brunner, C. (2014). Process modelling and technology evaluation in brewing. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 84, 98-108.
 
16.
Muster-Slawitsch, B., Weiss, W., Schnitzer, H., & Brunner, C. (2011). The green brewery concept–energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources in breweries. Applied Thermal Engineering, 31(13), 2123-2134.
 
17.
Pettigrew, L., Blomenhofer, V., Hubert, S., Groß, F., & Delgado, A. (2015). Optimisation of water usage in a brewery clean-in-place system using reference nets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 583-593.
 
18.
Sontag, B., Hirzel, S., Bender, O., Kloos, H., Laubach, M., Wallkötter, R., & Rohde, C. (2014). Energy-benchmarking within companies: insights from benchmarking practice. ECEEE–2014. Industrial summer study–retool for competitive and sustainable industry, Р, 637-646.
 
19.
Stapenhurst, T. (2009). The benchmarking book: Routledge.
 
20.
Sturm, B., Butcher, M., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., & Roskilly, T. (2012). The feasibility of the sustainable energy supply from bio wastes for a small scale brewery–A case study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 39, 45-52.
 
21.
Tan, Y. S., Tjandra, T. B., & Song, B. (2015). Energy efficiency benchmarking methodology for mass and high-mix low-volume productions. Procedia Cirp, 29, 120-125.
 
22.
Tanaka, K. (2011). Review of policies and measures for energy efficiency in industry sector. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6532-6550.
 
23.
Zhang, S., Worrell, E., Crijns-Graus, W., Krol, M., de Bruine, M., Geng, G., Cofala, J. (2016). Modeling energy efficiency to improve air quality and health effects of China’s cement industry. Applied energy, 184, 574-593.
 
24.
Zogla, L., Zogla, G., Beloborodko, A., & Rosa, M. (2015). Process benchmark for evaluation energy performance in breweries. Energy Procedia, 72, 202-208.
 
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top