Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Policies
Instruction for Authors
2/2019 vol. 23
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Get citation
New business models for Cultural and Creative Institutions
Sławomir Nikiel 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-12-21
 
 
Management 2019;23(2):124-137
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0022
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (42)
 
KEYWORDS
Business Administration
Management
and Operations
CCII
Business Models
 
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
M31
 
ABSTRACT
Total integration of social media and internet into daily life of the young people is the most distinct demographic characteristics of the Generation Z (born between 1995 and 2015). For Cultural and Creative Industries and Institutions in order to engage with this audience efficiently, their business models have to consider social media and more participative approach. The paper addresses the challenges and opportunities that face cultural institutions by analysing and assessing the business models related to new internet solutions. The paper provides a fresh review of the business models in which the author examines the new business model concepts through CCII subject-matter lenses. Discussed case-studies show generally successful result in activating Generation Z audience participation in cultural activities. While trying to understand limitations of the cultural institutions position and motivation towards social media and generally mobile internet, the paper raises critical implications of the pervasive internet in the CCII area.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2003). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Afuah, A. (2004). Business models: A strategic management approach. New York: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Amit, R., Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22: pp. 493-520.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Applegate, L. M. (2000). E-business models: Making sense of the internet business landscape. In G. Dickson & G. DeSanctis (Eds.), Information technology and the future enterprise: New models for managers: 49-101. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Applegate, L. M. (2001). Emerging e-business models: Lessons from the field. HBS No. 9-801-172, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Boiano, Stefania; Gaia, Giuliano; Caldarini, M. (2003). “Make Your Museum Talk: Natural Language Interfaces For Cultural Institutions” conference paper in Museums and the Web 2003, Toronto, CA, 20-22 March 2003.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Bollo, A. Dal Pozzolo, L. (2005). Analysis of visitor behaviour inside the museum: An empirical study. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Arts and Cultural Management, Montreal, vol. 2, pp. 113.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Brousseau, E., & Penard, T. (2006). The economics of digital business models: A framework for analyzing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2):pp. 81-110.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
ccaixiaozhu (2017): Videotage on Instagram: “[#videotagelike4like] no Face, no Identity, no Sound, no Language, no Subtitle, no Narration, no Context, Only Ambiguous…”, Available from: https://www.instagram.com/p/BU... - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Chung, K. (2018). Mediating Exhibitions via Audience Participation on Social Media: Collectivist Curatorial Approach in One World Exposition 2.1 Exhibition Proceedings of the EVA Berlin 2018 Conference, Berlin, 8-10 November 2018, pp. 151-159.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Combe, C. (2006). Introduction to e-business, management and strategy, Amsterdam - Boston - Heidelberg - Londyn - NowyJork - Oxford – Paryż.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1): pp. 5-23.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Edmonds, E., Muller, L., Connell, M. (2006). On Creative Engagement. Visual Communication, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 307-322.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Euromonitor report. https://go.euromonitor.com/whi... (29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Goh, E. & Lee, C. (2018). A Workforce to be Reckoned with: The Emerging Pivotal Generation Z Hospitality Workforce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 73, pp. 20-28.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Gorgels P. (2013): P. Gorgels, Rijksstudio: Make Your Own Masterpiece!. In Museums and the Web 2013, N. Proctor & R. Cherry (eds). Silver Spring, MD: Museums and the Web.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Hallam, J.(2012). The Social Media Manifesto, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Kapsalis, E. (2016). The Impact of Open Access on Galleries, Libraries, Museums, & Archives Smithsonian Emerging Leaders Development Program.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Loader, B., Vromen, A. & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The Networked Young Citizen: Social Media, Political Participation and Civic Engagement, Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Mansfield, G. M., & Fourie, L. C. H. (2004). Strategy and business models: Strange bedfellows? A case for convergence and its evolution into strategic architecture. South African Journal of Business Management, 33(1), pp. 35-44.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Mazediahttps://www.mazedia.fr/(29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58: pp. 726-35.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Museum4Punkt0 https://www.museum4punkt0.de/e... (29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Science (CAIS), 16: pp. 1-25.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Pew Research Center (2017). http://www.pewresearch.org/fac... (29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
ProhmA. (2018). Double Humboldt:Thoughts on the Digital Twinning of the Humboldt Brothers, Proceedings of the EVA Berlin 2018 Conference, Berlin, 8-10 November 2018, pp. 137-146.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Rappa, M. (2004). Business models on the Web. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://digitalenterprise.org/m... (29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Rennick-Egglestone, S., et Al.(2016). Families and Mobile Devices in Museums: Designing for Integrated Experiences. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 9(2): p. 1-13.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Sanderhoff, M. (2013). Open Images. Risk or opportunity for art collections in the digital age? Nordisk Museologi, (2), pp. 131-146.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Seelos, C., Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21: pp. 49-63.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., Linder, J. 2005. The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48: pp. 199-207.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Schnaedelbach, H. et Al. (2018). DIGITOPIA: An Interactive Experience to Accompany a Dance Performance for Families, Proceedings of the EVA Berlin 2018 Conference, Berlin, 8-10 November 2018, pp. 127-136.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Simal, J. (2005). On-Demand Printing Transforming Museum Visitors Experience. DPP2005: IS&T’s International Conference on Digital Production Printing and Industrial Applications, Amsterdam, pp. 141-142.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Stankiewicz, J., Seiler, B., Bortnowska, H. (2017). Young people as a subject of human resources management in the third sector organizations, Management 2/2017, pp. 68-80.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Stewart, D. W., Zhao, Q. (2000). Internet marketing, business models and public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19: pp. 287-296.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
The Times (2017) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/art... (29.01.2109 - access date).
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2):pp. 3-8.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Valeonti, F., Hudson-Smith, A., Terras, M., Zarkali, C. (2018): Reaping the Benefits of Digitisation: Pilot study exploring revenue generation from digitised collections through technological innovation. Proceeding of EVA London 2018, London, UK, 9-12 July 2018, BCS Learning and Development Limited, pp. 56-63.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Verwayen, H., Arnoldus, M., Kaufman P. (2011). The Problem of the Yellow Milkmaid, Europeana Whitepaper No.2.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Weill, P., Vitale, M. R. (2001). Place to space: Migrating to e-business models. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Yip, G. S. (2004). Using strategy to change your business model. Business Strategy Review, 15(15), 17-24.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Zott, C., Amit, R. (2009). The business model as the engine of network-based strategies. In P. R. Kleindorfer& Y. J Wind (Eds.), The network challenge. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing. pp. 259-275.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
The assessment of medical subject mamagers’ knowledge on topic of social responsibility
Benefits, challenges and opportunities of corporate sustainability
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2299-193X
ISSN:1429-9321 (1997-2019)
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top