Space and population – competitiveness determinants of countries in the age of globalization
More details
Hide details
1
M.Sc. University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management Poland
2
University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and ManagementPoland
Online publication date: 2018-12-19
Management 2018;22(2):121-140
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
In the 21st century in a globalized world the level of competitiveness depends on numerous factors. This article concentrates deliberations on several of them, including space, population and international exchange. For ages, the international position of a country depended on its geographical size or access to sea. The country’s size was also determined by its internal demographic potential. As civilization progressed, there was a reorientation of factors which influence the development of individual countries and their regions. The contemporary world has seen an emergence of countries with small surface area and minor human potential, which yet are global development leaders. In the literature, they are often referred to as small states. Analysis of research shows that small countries are more involved, for instance, in providing support for the society. International exchange is also important for the development of individual countries. In this aspect, small countries turn the apparent threat related to a small market into an advantage. In the conclusion of the deliberation, the authors of the study point out that despite significant economic, social and cultural evolution, space and population are still important elements of development, although, they note, the role of such elements of spatial policy as natural resources is smaller than in the past.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Aghion P., Durlauf S. (2005), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.
2.
Abell S. (2018), How Britain Really Works - Understanding the Ideas and Institutions of a Nation. Londyn: John Murray An Hachette UK Company.
4.
Eckaus R. S. (1961), The North-South Differential in Italian Economic Development. “The Jurnal of Economic History”, No. 3.
5.
Educational expenditure statistics (2017), Eurostat.
6.
Ferguson N. (2013), Cywilizacja – zachód i reszta świata. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
7.
Fries F. (1998), Spór o Europę. Warszawa PWN.
8.
GDP at regional level (2017), Eurostat.
9.
Ha-Joon C. (2011), 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalisim. Londyn: Penguin Books.
10.
Healthcare expenditure statistics (2015), Eurostat.
11.
Huntington S. (1993), The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs nr. 3, 22-49.
12.
Martin R. L. (2003), A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness. Bruxelles: Directorate-General Regional Policy.
13.
Natella S., Keating G. (2014), The Success od Small Countries. Zurich: Credit Suisse.
14.
Natella S., O’Sullivan M. (2015), The success of small countries and markets. Zurich: Credit Suisse.
15.
Pawlak K. (2004), Determinanty konkurencyjności międzynarodowej – ewolucja poglądów. „Ekonomia / Uniwersytet Warszawski”, No. 16.
16.
Polasek W., Sellner R. (2011), Does Globalization Affect Regional Growth?: Evidence for NUTS-2 Regions in EU-27. Wiedeń: Institute For Advanced Studies.
17.
Rivas M. G. (2007), The effects of trade openness on regional inequality in Mexico. “The Annals of Regional Science”, No. 41.
18.
Sługocki W. (2014), Od podejścia scentralizowanego do zregionalizowanego -próba określenia kierunków ewolucji polityki spójności UE realizowanej w Polsce w latach 2004-2020 w: Polska w Unii Europejskiej : gospodarka - energetyka - region (eds.) E. Jakubowski, W. Sługocki - Warszawa.