Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About
Editorial Office
Scientific Board
Abstract & Indexing
Contact
Reviewers list
Editorial Policies
Authorship & COI
Ethical principles
Crossmark
Principles of Transparent Checklist
Open access
Instruction for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
Manuscript Types
Manuscript structure
How to submit
Stakeholders management in public hospitals in the context of resources
1
University of Economics in Katowice
Online publication date: 2012-12-28
Management 2012;16(2):217-230
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Stakeholders management in public hospitals - from stakeholders management to stakeholders relations Public sector organisations have a sufficient influence to win political legitimization and resources to finance their operations by satisfying their stakeholders. Organizations that adopt stakeholder management principles probably better satisfy their constituent needs and balance their interests, which results in higher capacity of goal achievement. The question of what initiatives were undertaken by public sector organisations to manage different stakeholders, and what were their motivations is still unanswered. The aim of this paper is to understand how stakeholder groups are being recognized in the public hospitals’ decision-making in context of resources.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Agle B.R., Mitchell R.K., Sonnenfeld J.A. (1999), Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values, “Academy of Management Journal”, nr 42.
2.
Banks M., Vera D. (2007), Towards a typology of stakeholder management strategies, “Academy of Management Conference”, Philadelphia, PA.
3.
Barringer B.R., Harrison J.S. (2000), Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships, “Journal of Management”, nr 26.
4.
Blair J.D., Whitehead C.J. (1988), Too many on the seesaw: Stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals, “Hospital & Health Services Administration”, Vol. 02, nr 33 (2).
5.
Bryson J.M. (2004), What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identifi cation and analysis techniques, “Public Management Review”, nr 6 (1).
6.
Donaldson T., Preston L.E. (1995), The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 20.
7.
Eesley C, Lenox M.J. (2006), Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action, “Strategic Management Journal”, nr 27.
8.
Ferlie E., Hartley J., Martin C. (2003), Changing public service organizations: current perspectives and future prospect, “British Journal of Management” Special Issue, Vol. 14.
9.
Freeman J.H. (1982), Organizational life cycles and natural selection processes, [w:] Staw B.M., Cummings L.L., Research in organizational behavior , JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.
10.
Freeman R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman, Boston.
11.
Harrison J.S., St. John C.H. (1997), StrategicManagement of Organizations and Stakeholders: Concepts and Cases (2nd edn), Thomson South-western, Cincinnati, OH.
12.
Hillman A.J., Keim G.D., Luce R.A. (2001), Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference?, “Business and Society”, nr 40.
13.
Hosseini J.C., Brenner S.N. (1992), A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights, “Business Ethics Quarterly: nr 2.
14.
Jones T.M. (1995), Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 20.
15.
Kumar K., Subramanian R. (1996), Meeting the Expectations of Key Stakeholders: Stakeholder Management in the Health Care Industry, “Sam Advanced Management Journal”, nr 65 (2).
16.
Lee S.D., Alexander J.A. (1999), Managing hospitalsin turbulent times: Do organisational changes improve hospital survival, “Health Service Research”, nr 34 (4).
17.
Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.D. (1997), Toward a theory of stakeholder identifi cation and salience: defi ning the principle of who or what really counts, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 24 (2).
18.
Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. (1978/2003), The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York.
19.
Phillips R.A. (2003), Stakeholder Legitimacy, “Business Ethics Quarterly”, nr 13 (1).
20.
Rainey H. (1997), Understanding and managing public organization, Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, CA.
21.
Rowley T.J. (1997), Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder infl uences, Academy of Management Review”, nr 22.
22.
Scott D.J., Ofori-Dankwa J.C., Justis R.T. (2008), Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures, “Strategic Management Journal”, nr 29.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2299-193X |
| ISSN: | 1429-9321 (1997-2019) |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
