Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About
Editorial Office
Scientific Board
Abstract & Indexing
Contact
Reviewers list
Editorial Policies
Authorship & COI
Ethical principles
Crossmark
Principles of Transparent Checklist
Open access
Instruction for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
Manuscript Types
Manuscript structure
How to submit
The Network Concept of Strategic Management and Its Limitations / Sieciowa koncepcja zarządzania strategicznego i jej ograniczenia
1
Poznań University of Economics
Online publication date: 2013-05-31
Management 2013;17(1):19-30
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the article is to contribute to the discussion on the network concept of strategic management and the limitations thereof. The article opens with a presentation of the origin of the concept of network organizations, which further on allows the author to discuss the concept of networks in strategic management, pinpoint its limitations and assess the validity of the assumption that a new paradigm of the strategic management theory is emerging.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Bowman E. H. (2000), Strategy Change: Possible Worlds and Actual Minds, Harper & Row, New York.
2.
Dyer J. H., Singh H., (2004), The Relational View: Cooperative Strategyand Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, “Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 23 (4), s. 660-679.
3.
Eccles R. G. (1981), The quasi firm in the construction industry, “Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization”, Vol. 2 (4) s. 335-357.
4.
Gomes- Casseres B. (2006), The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape ofBusiness Rivalry, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5.
Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. (2007), A general theory of networkgovernance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms, “Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 22 (4), s. 911-945.
6.
Kanter R. M. (1994), Collaborative Advantage: The Art of Alliances, “Harvard Business Review”, Vol. 72 (4), s. 96-108.
7.
Lowendahl B., Revand O. (1998), Challenges to Existing Strategy Theoryin a Postindustrial Society, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 19 (8), s. 755-774.
8.
Moore B. (1995), The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Ageof Business Ecosystems, Harper Collins, New York.
9.
Niemczyk J., Stańczyk-Hugiet E., Jasiński B. (2012), Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwanie dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania, C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
10.
Powell T. C. (2008), The Philosophy of Strategy, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 23 ( 9), s. 873-880.
11.
Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. (1994), Strategy as a Fields of Study: Why Searchfor a New Paradigm?, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 15 (Summer special issue), s. 5-16.
13.
Taylor B. (1995), The New Strategic Leadership - Driving Change, GettingResults, “Long Range Planning”, Vol. 28 (5), s. 71- 81.
14.
Venkatraman N., Subramaniam M. (2002), Theorizing the Future of Strategy:Questions for Shaping Strategy Research in the Knowledge Economy, Sage Publications, London.
15.
Volberda H. W. (2003), Strategic Flexibility: Creating Dynamic CompetitiveAdvantage, Oxford University Press, New York.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2299-193X |
| ISSN: | 1429-9321 (1997-2019) |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
